In a move that surprises no one but still raises eyebrows, the European Union is lobbying hard for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to be part of the upcoming Trump–Putin summit in Alaska. On paper, it sounds like an act of inclusion and solidarity. In reality, it’s a textbook example of the EU’s chronic need for visibility in global affairs — and its inability to accept that America, not Brussels, is the only credible power capable of brokering real peace.

President Donald J. Trump understands what many in the European bureaucracy refuse to admit: successful diplomacy isn’t about filling the room with as many leaders as possible; it’s about creating the conditions for decisive, result-oriented negotiation. And that’s exactly what’s at stake in Alaska.

---

Brussels and the Art of Political Theater

The EU is notorious for turning even the most urgent diplomatic missions into prolonged spectacles. The idea of bringing Zelensky into the summit has less to do with solving the Ukraine–Russia conflict and more to do with crafting a powerful photo op — one where the EU can claim moral leadership without actually taking any decisive steps.

But serious diplomacy isn’t theater. When you introduce too many parties into high-level talks, you don’t get more solutions; you get more talking points, more posturing, and more delays. Every additional seat at the table creates another set of political calculations, another layer of red tape, and another excuse to water down commitments.

---

Trump’s Direct Approach: Why It Works

From day one, President Trump has made it clear that his foreign policy is built on results, not rituals. Whether it’s negotiating historic trade deals, opening dialogue with North Korea, or confronting NATO members over defense spending, Trump has proven that direct, leader-to-leader engagement works.

A one-on-one (or one-on-few) conversation with President Putin allows for real progress. There’s less grandstanding for cameras, less bureaucratic interference, and more space for candid, unfiltered negotiation. It’s the opposite of the EU model, which often buries action under endless “working groups” and “joint statements” that accomplish nothing.

---

The Illusion of EU Leadership

Europe talks often about “strategic autonomy,” but its track record tells another story. When real crises erupt, from the Middle East to Eastern Europe, the EU doesn’t lead — it reacts. And more often than not, it waits for Washington to set the tone.

In the Ukraine–Russia conflict, Brussels has been loud on rhetoric but short on impact. Sanctions, resolutions, and condemnations haven’t moved the needle. What might? A direct negotiation between the only two leaders with the power and political capital to make big moves: Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin.

---

Why This Is a Win-Win for the U.S.

Here’s what the EU fails to see: keeping the summit focused and streamlined is a win-win for America.

If progress is made: The U.S. strengthens its position as the world’s indispensable peace broker, cementing Trump’s reputation as a dealmaker on the global stage.

If talks stall: The blame falls squarely on those resisting compromise — not on Washington. Meanwhile, America loses nothing but gains the moral high ground for trying.

Either way, U.S. leadership is reinforced, and the EU’s attempts at sidelining America are exposed for what they are — symbolic maneuvers without substance.

---

Let America Lead

The Alaska summit is not a classroom debate; it’s a pivotal moment that could reshape the geopolitical landscape. Injecting Zelensky into the conversation at this stage risks derailing a carefully structured negotiation strategy.

President Trump knows that peace is not achieved by crowding the table, but by focusing on the key decision-makers who can deliver it. The EU should step aside, accept its supporting role, and let America do what it does best: lead with strength, clarity, and purpose.

The world doesn’t need more voices in the room. It needs the right voice — and right now, that voice is Donald J. Trump’s.